On Jul 26, 2:26pm, Mark Moraes wrote: > Subject: Re: Bad Advise > | I was thinking about ownership of the whole ftp-tree by user `nobody'. Are > | there any benefits to using `root' instead of `nobody'? > > In general, I advise that one never lets anything be owned by `nobody'. > The user `nobody' has a specific purpose -- it's the server-side mapping > of root on an NFS client. If you set anything on a server owned by > `nobody', root on clients can access it, if the partition is NFS > accessible. And who knows when and how any partition might become NFS > accessible. The Network is the Computer, right? :-) > > Mark. >-- End of excerpt from Mark Moraes In this case, `nobody` really maps to `everybody` !